Missional

You are currently browsing the archive for the Missional category.

Kingdom Conversation #4 Missional Renaissance – April 18, 2009

April 21, 2009 in Missional by Jeff | No comments

Literature about the Missional Church is growing very quickly. There is a sense in many circles that something new is developing in the North American church that holds more encouragement for the 21st century church than anything else in recent memory. In his 2009 book, Missional Renaissance, Reggie McNeal writes very boldly about the changes underway.

“The rise of the missional church is the single biggest development in Christianity since the Reformation. The post-Reformation church of the modern era differed remarkably from its medieval predecessor. The missional church will just as dramatically distinguish itself from what we now call ‘church’….This missional understanding of Christianity is undoing Christianity as a religion. The expression of the Christian movement in North America is fundamentally altering before our eyes. The shifts are tectonic. They involve both form and content. These developments go way beyond denominational affiliations, party labels (liberal, conservative, mainline, evangelical), corporate worship styles (contemporary, traditional), program methodological approaches (purpose driven, seeker friendly), or even cultural stances, (postmodern, emergent, emerging). The missional development goes to the very heart of what the church is, not just what it does. It redefines the church’s role in the world in a way that breaks sharply with prevailing church notions. These differences are so huge as to make missional and nonmissional expressions of Christianity practically unrecognizable to each other.”

A sign that God is at work is often evident in how many barriers are transcended. The Missional Conversation, with a renewed appreciation for the importance of the kingdom of God, can be found in many, many different denominations. To help you get a better sense of the depth and breadth of this conversation, I am including three websites for you to visit and see different facets of the Missional Conversation at work.

Two of these websites are connected to Tyndale Seminary in Toronto. Some of the information in these two websites overlap but in the first Tyndale website, a good deal of literature is made available online not noted in the second website.

The Forge Canada website is a recent venture between an Australian group and Cam Roxburgh of a CBWC church in Surrey. Also, Gary Nelson of CBM fame, has recently published a book (Nov 2008) titled, Borderland Churches, A Congregation’s Invitation to Missional Living.”

What missional resources are you aware of that might be shared with the rest of the group?

Tags: Missional

Incarnational Ministry – Kingdom Conversation #3

March 28, 2009 in Missional by Les | No comments

The dictionary definition of ‘incarnate’ is, to embody in flesh; give bodily form to. So the coming of Jesus to earth as a human being is referred to as the incarnation because Jesus embodied God in human flesh. God who is Spirit became visible and more accessible to human beings because of the bodily form he took on. As Jesus put it, “Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father” (John 14:9). God’s approach to ministry (i.e. announcing the kingdom of God on earth) was to enter into the middle of human experience as a humble servant and in word and deed announce the kingdom of God. Those engaged in the missional conversation suggest that the church’s approach to ministry should be the same as God’s approach to ministry. Mike Erre in a book with a provocative title, Death by Church (I much prefer death by chocolate) expands on this point.

The work that Jesus calls us to is to bear witness to the kingdom of God and call people to life in that kingdom (life in Christ) by our words and actions. As the church, we are called individually and corporately to embody this incarnational way of living like Jesus did:

Presence. Instead of withdrawing and separating ourselves from the world, we engage the world and live within it. At times, incarnation will simply require us to be a part of the fabric of the surrounding culture, meeting people on their terms, loving them without an agenda. It is to be in the world but not of it. The worst thing we can do is to isolate people into Christian subcultures.

Proximity. Just like Jesus, we need to be directly active and involved in the lives of the people we are trying to reach. We must be both present and available to them. We must be willing to engage their world and not wait for them to come to us. We learn to speak their language and learn about their lives. As Paul said, “I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some.”

A theology of place is central to incarnation. We need to reclaim houses and neighborhoods and dorm rooms as places where we are available to God and others to participate in God’s redemption. We need to understand that where we live is important because all of the law and prophets hang on loving our neighbours.

Powerlessness. Jesus didn’t manipulate or coerce people into the kingdom, nor did He use grand displays of power or promise trouble-free living. He used genuine humble service to break past their skepticism and touch their souls, and the He called His disciples to follow suit.

Proclamation. Just as Jesus initiated the gospel invitation, we are charged with the role of continuing to proclaim to a lost and dying world (Matthew 28:18-20; 2 Corinthians 5:18-20), and embody its presence through the ministry of the Holy Spirit.

One reason that I like the question, “Where is the kingdom of God not?” followed by the question, “How might be the Holy Spirit be leading us to represent the kingdom of God in that place?” is that we are led into incarnational ministry. We are led out from our four walls to where people actually are in order to embody the good news of the kingdom.

What current ministry at Elk Lake Baptist is the most ‘incarnational’ at the present time?

Tags: incarnational, kingdom of God

The Meaning of “Missional”

March 18, 2009 in Missional by Les | 1 comment

There is the purpose driven church, the charismatic or non-charismatic church, the liturgical or non-liturgical church, the seeker friendly church service or traditional church service. We have lots of terms like this kicking around: what is the value of talking now about the “missional church”?

For the next number of years, the term “missional” will only become more frequent in our vocabulary. Our own denomination has a “Missional Director“, one of the three adjectives used to describe the new M.Div program (designed to train pastors) at our denomination’s theological college (Carey) is “missional” and the stated goal of our denominational leaders is to move our denomination in “missional” directions. The missional conversation also transcends denominational boundaries and can be found everywhere. It seems we are going to hear a lot more about things being or becoming missional so we need to understand why this new term is being used so much.

What is behind this term, “missional”?

First, it is no accident that the word “mission” is embedded within this new term but there is a reason why the word “mission” was not employed. If I told you that in the middle of May we would be having a “missions weekend” at the church, what would you expect to happen? Most of us would expect that there would be some missionaries in attendance telling us about their work, probably overseas, but possibly somewhere in places of special need in North America. The “missional” conversation wants to change the way we think about missions which is why a slightly different word was used. Note: Missional thinking is not against missionaries and conferences where missionaries speak about their work.

Here is one of the big changes in the way we think about missions suggested by the missional conversation:

1. Many churches treat mission as one activity of the church amongst others. So we have a CE Committee to look after Christian Education, we have a Building and Grounds Committee to care for the building and grounds, we have a Finance Committee to look after the church’s money and we have a Missions Committee to keep us informed about missionaries and to promote mission attitudes. From this perspective, mission is something we do along with a number of other things.

Missional thinking says that mission is not something we do as much as it is something we are to embody.
The missional conversation is trying to move missions (redefined) from being one activity amongst others of the church to being at the core of our identity. This is why the word “mission” is so important to the missional discussion and why the term “missional” was chosen.

What it means to engage in missions is being reevaluated but make no mistake about it, the missional conversation is extremely interested in mission. It wants however, to take its cues for defining what mission is all about, from the ministry of Jesus, not just the traditions and practices of churches in North America over the last number of decades. As was noted last week, the ministry of Jesus was centered around announcing the kingdom of God and so we need to think about missions as announcing the kingdom of God. Here is a key point in the missional conversation: the CE Committee, the Finance Committee, The B&G Committee should be no less concerned with announcing the kingdom of God than the Missions Committee, not after their committee work is done but in how they function as a committee and what they are trying to accomplish as a committee. When all parts of the church see their role as participating in the mission of Jesus, then we are moving in the direction of embodying the mission of God. We will identify ourselves as a ‘sent people’ (sent on the same mission that Jesus was on) and we will think more about what it means to announce the kingdom of God by the way we organize ourselves and the manner of our lifestyle as people of the kingdom. We will incarnate (embody, display) the ministry of Jesus in who we are as a church and who we are as followers of Jesus.

You are welcome to join the conversation by responding in the comments.

Given this perspective, what should the mandate for the ELB missions committee be?

Tags: conversation, Missional

Beginning a Missional Conversation

March 18, 2009 in Missional by Les | 2 comments

First, about the term, “Missional”. It is the term being used as a short hand way to refer to a discussion about the nature of the church and what God is doing in this world. That conversation focuses around learning to think about the church as an agent of the kingdom…participating in the mission of God. A term like ‘missional’ can’t help but feel faddish and one day it will probably not be used except as a historical reference (how often do we hear about ‘seeker-friendly’ services anymore?). There are reasons why this term is being used, and the fact that it is so close to ‘mission’ is not accidental. Our denomination is increasingly using missional language. For example, Carey Theological College just released a news bulletin announcing a new Master of Divinity degree program. They advertise the degree this way: The breakdown of course work will reflect the importance Carey places on being practical, accessible and missional. Using missional language will have the benefit of keeping us in touch with the growing use of and emphasis on missional concepts in our denomination and beyond.

There are some things, which we do hold in common, and which are vitally important and explain why I think the missional/kingdom conversation is so important.

The central focus of Jesus’ teachings and actions while he was earth was the kingdom of God. The mission of Jesus was to announce the kingdom of God. As Jesus begins his public ministry, Matthew writes, “From that time on Jesus began to preah, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has come near.” Matthew 4:17
Our mission is to participate in God’s mission. The church has not been given a mission or calling different than that of Jesus. As the book of Acts reveals, Jesus continues to act through the Holy Spirit to accomplish his mission on earth and that mission is the announcing of the kingdom. This is why Jesus taught us to pray, “Your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” We are invited/commanded to participate in this mission. Jesus says to us, “As the Father has sent me, so I am sending you.” John 20:21.
If we are going to be faithful to our calling as Christians, i.e. participating in what God is doing, we too will find central to our ministry the announcing of the kingdom.

This is why this conversation is so very important. It is about the ministry of ELB being more fully aligned with the ministry of Jesus which was and is announcing the kingdom of God. Even if, at this point, we have little idea what “announcing the kingdom of God” might actually look like, the one thing Scripture leads us to embrace is that our ministry is to participate in the ministry of Jesus which is all about the kingdom of God. To the extent that the missional conversation is about this, this is a conversation that we MUST participate in.

Your thoughts are welcome as we share this conversation together…please offer some comments.

Question: What is your reaction to the statements, “Our mission is to participate in God’s mission. The church has not been given a mission or calling different than that of Jesus.”

Blessings,
Les